Evaluating Python library safety comes down to a few key dimensions:
Check the source and provenance
- PyPI page: Look at download counts, release history, and whether the project links to a real GitHub/GitLab repo.
- Author/org reputation: Libraries maintained by well-known companies (Google, Meta, Microsoft, Palantir) or established OSS orgs carry more trust than anonymous accounts.
- Typosquatting: Be careful with names that look like popular packages (e.g., requets instead of requests). Always double-check the exact name before installing.
Assess activity and maintenance
- Last release date: A library with no releases in 2+ years may have unpatched vulnerabilities.
- Open issues and PRs: A large backlog of unaddressed security issues is a red flag.
- Bus factor: If it’s one person maintaining it with no activity, it’s a dependency risk.
Look at the dependency chain
- Run pip show <package> to see what it pulls in — a simple-looking library can bring in dozens of transitive dependencies, each a potential risk.
- Tools like pip-audit or Safety scan your installed packages against known CVE databases.
Scan for known vulnerabilities
- pip-audit (recommended): pip-audit -r requirements.txt — queries the OSV and PyPI Advisory databases.
- Snyk: integrates well into CI/CD and covers transitive deps.
- safety check: Another CLI option, though now requires a free account.
- GitHub Dependabot: Flags vulnerable versions in your requirements.txt automatically.
Inspect the code itself (for high-risk libs)
- For anything touching auth, crypto, networking, or file I/O, a quick scan of the source is worthwhile.
- Watch for: obfuscated code, suspicious exec()/eval() calls, unexpected network calls at import time, or install hooks in setup.py.
Check the license
- Verify the license is compatible with your project (MIT, Apache 2.0, BSD = generally fine; GPL may have copyleft implications in commercial software).
Use a lock file and pin versions
- pip-compile (from pip-tools) or poetry.lock ensure you’re always using the exact audited version, not a silently updated one.
Practical starting point for most projects
Use common sense and search for things like “<library> reviews and reputation”. Sometimes it flags the most critical aspects !
#pip install pip-audit
#pip-audit -r requirements.txt
For CI/CD (assuming a GitHub Actions + Snyk setup), combining Snyk’s SCA with pip-audit in the pipeline gives you both real-time scanning and audit trail coverage — which, btw, also maps well to SOC 2 CC6.x controls around dependency risk. 😉
One thought on “Evaluating Python libraries reputation and safety”
Comments are closed.